Houston v. Wright et al
| Douglas Houston |
| Lester N. Wright, Doctor Johnson and John Doe |
| 9:2010cv01009 |
| August 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Greene |
| Norman A. Mordue |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 119 ) of United States Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks is accepted. ORDERED that the sole remaining claim in the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 14 ), th e conditions-of-confinement claim against Dr. Johnson is dismissed with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). ORDERED that the case is dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 9/15/14. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER: ORDERED that: 1. The 64 Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. 2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 52 ) is granted as to plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim against defendant Johnson, and denied as to plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim against defendant Johnson. Defendants Doe and Wright are dismissed from this action. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 9/27/2013. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
