Lopez v. Wright et al
| George Lopez |
| W. Hunt, D. Venne, John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2, C. Grimshaw, V. Olsen, D. Bushey and D. Jolicoen |
| 9:2011cv00418 |
| April 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 75 ) is APPROVED in part. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 6/19/14. (served via regular mail on plaintiff) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 53 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion (Dkt. No. 45 ) for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. ORDERED, that Plaintiff' ;s conspiracy claim as set forth in his Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED. ORDERED, that this case is recommitted to Judge Dancks for an evidentiary hearing to determine Plaintiff's justification for failure to exhaust administrative remedies for his excessiveforce claim. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/28/13. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
