Barnes v. Prack et al
| Jessie J. Barnes |
| C. Stickney, R. Caron, David Mattoon, M. Yaddow, R. Lordi, Gokey, B. Derouche, T. Bowman, R. Winston, K. St. Mary, Brian Fischer, P. Cook, Albert Prack, David A. Rock and D. Uhler |
| 9:2011cv00857 |
| July 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Franklin |
| David R. Homer |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 7/18/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)
|
|
Filing
60
DECISION & ORDER: Court accepts and adopts Magistrate Judge Hummel's recommendations for the reasons stated in his report. Accordingly, defendants' motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 28 , 35 ) are DENIED as to the failure to allege the persona l involvement of defendants Prack and Lordi, and GRANTED as to all other defendants and claims. To the extent Plaintiff appeals from that much of the Report-Recommendation and Order that determined the issue of amendment of the complaint, the appeal is rejected and Magistrate Judge Hummel's amendment order is affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/15/2013. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail) Modified on 3/18/2013 (ptm, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
