Gonzalvo et al v. Brown et al
| Ruben Gonzalvo, Joseph DeMatteo, James Henderson, Anthony J Broncatello, Elminio Ortiz and Jose Rosario |
| W. Brown, Catherine M. Jacobsen, Simmons, Karen Bellamy, Williams and Gibson |
| 9:2011cv00909 |
| August 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Ulster |
| David E. Peebles |
| Norman A. Mordue |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the case is resolved and terminated without the need for a written, signed stipulation. ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed with prejudice and the case closed. ORDERED that the motion (Dkt. No. 96 ) is denied. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 11/19/15. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER: ORDERED that the 65 Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. ORDERED, that the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 54 ) is denied. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 1/30/15. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: ORDERED, that the 33 Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. ORDERED, that defendants' 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 8/2/13. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
