Mendez v. Knoblach et al
| Angel Mendez |
| Knoblach, Collins, Masner and State of New York Department of Correctional Services |
| 9:2011cv00961 |
| August 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Chemung |
| David R. Homer |
| David N. Hurd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that, the 60 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED, that Ms. Mendez's 50 Motion to Substitute is DENIED. ORDERED, that this case is DISMISSED for failure to substitute within 90 days after service of the statement noting the death of plaintiff Angel Mendez pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a). Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/26/13. (served on Carmen Mendez by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
30
DECISION AND ORDER: The 24 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. ORDERED, that Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss based on the statute of limitations is DENIED. Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss the claims against the State of Ne w York Department of Corrections and Community Services is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED as against the State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Services. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 6/13/12. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
