Dolberry v. Jakob, et al
Andre Dolberry |
Jakob, Saltsman, Silverman, John Doe, Acting Supt. Gutwein, Lt. McDermont and Supt. Martuscello |
9:2011cv01018 |
August 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Prisoner Office |
XX US, Outside State |
David E. Peebles |
David N. Hurd |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 216 DECISION AND ORDER that plaintiff's motion for a new trial (Dkt. No. 194 ) is DENIED; plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law (Dkt. No. 195 ) is DENIED; plaintiff's motion for discrimination in selection of jury array (Dkt. No. 196 ) is DENIED; and defendants' motion for bill of costs (Dkt. No. 201 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge David N. Hurd on 3/28/2019. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail). (sal) |
Filing 157 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 129 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 5/15/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, ) |
Filing 103 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 1. The judgment of the Decision and Order (ECF No. 90) remains in effect; 2. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED (ECF No. 92 ); and 3. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel is DENIED (ECF No. 97 ) as premature with leave to renew at a later date. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/4/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail; copy served on 2nd CCA) (alh, ) |
Filing 90 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the denial of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment remains in effect. ORDERED, that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. ORDERED, that all causes of action aga inst defendants Silvernail, Gutwein, McDermont and Martuscello are DISMISSED on the merits. ORDERED, that the only claim remaining is the cause of action for retaliation against defendants Jakob and Saltsman. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 1/15/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, ) |
Filing 56 DECISION AND ORDER: The 54 Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED, that Plaintiff's 37 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's complaint is DI SMISSED in its entirety based upon his material misrepresentations to the court and abuse of the litigation process. ORDERED, that Defendants' 45 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/28/14. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.