Ali v. Hogan et al
Jamaal Ali |
Terri Maxymillian, Michael F. Hogan and Donald Sawyer |
9:2012cv00104 |
January 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Prisoner Office |
Oneida |
David N. Hurd |
Randolph F. Treece |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 DECISION AND ORDER: The 50 Report and Recommendation is accepted in whole; the 43 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. ORDERED that Plaintiff's remaining ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims are DISMISSED; Supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims is declined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice and th complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 12/2/14. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas) |
Filing 34 DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that 32 Report and Recommendations is accepted and adopted in whole. ORDERED that 23 Motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted as to (a) Plaintiff's § 1983 claim is DISMISSED; (b) Plaintiff 9;s claims pursuant to the ADA and Rehabilitation Act against defendants in their individual capacities are DISMISSED; (c) Plaintiff's New York State Human Rights Law claims against defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED; (d) Plai ntiff's claims pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act for monetary damages against defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED; (e) Plaintiff's claim pursuant to the New York Mental Hygiene Law is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)(2). Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED as follows: (a) DENIED as to plaintiff's New York State Human Rights Law claim against defendants in their individual capacities; (b) DENIE D as to plaintiff's claims pursuant to the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act for declaratory and injunctive relief against defendants in their official capacities; (c) DENIED, without prejudice, as to plaintiff's claims pursuant to the ADA f or monetary damages against defendants in their official capacities; and (d) DENIED, without prejudice, as to defendants' qualified immunity defense. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/30/13. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.