Rodriguez v. Rosner
Plaintiff: Jesus Rodriguez
Defendant: David Rosner
Case Number: 9:2012cv00958
Filed: June 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 DECISION & ORDER: Ordered that: (1) Defendant's 16 motion to dismiss be GRANTED; (2) Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and (3) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel be DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 2/19/2013. (ptm) (Copy served plaintiff by regular mail)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Rosner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesus Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Rosner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?