Weathers v. Rock et al
| Albert Weathers |
| Rabbi Friedmann, David Rock, D. Haug, S. Paterson, A. Forbes, Sgt. Debya, R. Demers, Mr. Kroeger and D. Uhler |
| 9:2012cv01301 |
| August 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Franklin |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Norman A. Mordue |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER: ORDERED, that the 78 Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. ORDERED, that defendants' 64 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and the compliant is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 9/23/14. (served on plaintiff by regular and certified mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 35 ) is hereby adopted in its entirety. ORDERED, that the defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 23 ) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: a) The complaint is dismissed w ithout prejudice as to defendant UHLER based on a lack of personal involvement; b) The complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the plaintiff's Fourth Cause of Action against defendant FORBES; c) The complaint is dismissed without prejudice as against ALL DEFENDANTS as to plaintiff's claim that he was entitled to attend the Seder meal with other inmates. Signed by Judge Norman A. Mordue on 5/16/13. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
