Bost v. VanBlarcum et al
Granville Bost |
Paul J. VanBlarcum, Ray Acevedo, Ulster County Legislature, Terry Banardo, Jane/John Doe, Ellen Kirpatrick and Barry E. Goldman, M.D., P.C. |
9:2012cv01548 |
October 12, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Prisoner Office |
Saratoga |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Thomas J. McAvoy |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 DECISION & ORDER: ORDERED, that plaintiff's objections, dkt. # 60, to the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Dancks, dkt. # 59, are hereby OVERRULED. ORDERED, that the 59 Report-Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED. ORDERED, that the M otion for Summary Judgment of defendants Kirkpatrick, Goodman, and Goldman, dkt. # 48 , is GRANTED. ORDERED, that the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Acevedo, dkt. # 52 , is hereby GRANTED. ORDERED, that the Clerk of Court is directed t o enter judgment in defendants' favor on plaintiff's Complaint. ORDERED, that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of cross-defendants on defendant Acevedo's cross-claim, dkt. # 18. ORDERED, that the Clerk of Cou rt is directed to enter judgment in favor of cross-defendant on the cross-claims of defendants Goldman, Goodman and Kilpatrick, dkt. ##s 29-31. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/16/15. (served on plaintiff by regular and certified mail) (alh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.