Guillory v. Boll et al
| Patrick Guillory |
| Maureen Boll, Kathleen Washburn and B. Johnston |
| 9:2012cv01771 |
| December 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Franklin |
| David E. Peebles |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
220
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A). Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 5/12/16. (served on plaintiff by regular and certified mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER: ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Peebles' August 28, 2014 145 Report-Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ORDERS that Defendants' 103 motion for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice to renew following the completion of discovery. ORDERS that this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Peebles for all further pretrial matters. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 9/22/14. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER REJECTING 42 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Patrick Guillory and DENYING 40 Letter Motion from Patrick Guillory llory requesting that Magistrate Judge Peebles be removed from this action.. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 6/1/2013. [pltf served via regular mail](bjw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
