Williams v. Lane

Williams v. Lane

Plaintiff:	Wonder Williams
Defendant:	Lane
Case Number:	9:2013cv00965
Filed:	August 13, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
County:	Cayuga
Presiding Judge:	Gary L. Sharpe
Presiding Judge:	Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 15, 2016	Filing 96 ORDER adopting 92 Report and Recommendations; granting 57 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing this action. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 8/15/16 (served on plaintiff via regular mail). (rjb, )
June 6, 2014	Filing 13 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 12 ) is accepted for filing and is deemed the operative pleading; and it is further ORDERED that Howard Graham, Karen Bellamy, John Doe (Deputy Superintendent), M. Courtney, C .O. Chandler, John Doe # 1 (Sergeant), Stock, John Doe (Correctional Officer), or John Doe # 2 (Sergeant), and all claims against them, are DISMISSED without prejudice as defendants; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff is afforded an opportuni ty to either (1) submit a completed and signed IFP Application which has been signed and certified by an appropriate official at his facility; or (2) request an order of this Court directing service by the U.S. Marshal and provide payment of the service fee to the U.S. Marshal in full by money order or certified check; and it is further ORDERED that upon plaintiff's submission of an IFP Application or request for assistance with service of process, the Clerk shall return the file to th e Court for further review; and it is further ORDERED that if plaintiff does not submit an IFP Application or a request for assistance with service of process within twenty (20) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk shall is sue summonses and forward them to plaintiff, who shall beresponsible for effecting service of process on defendants Lane, Chuttey, and McCarthy.Upon issuance of the summons, the Clerk shall send a copy of the summons and secondamended complaint to th e Office of the New York Attorney General, together with a copy of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED that defendants Lane, Chuttey, and McCarthy, or their counsel, file a response to the second amended complaint as provided for in th e Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after service of process upon them; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order on the plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/6/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 15, 2016

Filing 96 ORDER adopting 92 Report and Recommendations; granting 57 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing this action. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 8/15/16 (served on plaintiff via regular mail). (rjb, )

June 6, 2014

Filing 13 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 12 ) is accepted for filing and is deemed the operative pleading; and it is further ORDERED that Howard Graham, Karen Bellamy, John Doe (Deputy Superintendent), M. Courtney, C .O. Chandler, John Doe # 1 (Sergeant), Stock, John Doe (Correctional Officer), or John Doe # 2 (Sergeant), and all claims against them, are DISMISSED without prejudice as defendants; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff is afforded an opportuni ty to either (1) submit a completed and signed IFP Application which has been signed and certified by an appropriate official at his facility; or (2) request an order of this Court directing service by the U.S. Marshal and provide payment of the service fee to the U.S. Marshal in full by money order or certified check; and it is further ORDERED that upon plaintiff's submission of an IFP Application or request for assistance with service of process, the Clerk shall return the file to th e Court for further review; and it is further ORDERED that if plaintiff does not submit an IFP Application or a request for assistance with service of process within twenty (20) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk shall is sue summonses and forward them to plaintiff, who shall beresponsible for effecting service of process on defendants Lane, Chuttey, and McCarthy.Upon issuance of the summons, the Clerk shall send a copy of the summons and secondamended complaint to th e Office of the New York Attorney General, together with a copy of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED that defendants Lane, Chuttey, and McCarthy, or their counsel, file a response to the second amended complaint as provided for in th e Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after service of process upon them; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order on the plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/6/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Lane
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wonder Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lane
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?