Cintron v. Weissman et al
| David Cintron |
| Evelyn Weissman, D. Maas and Marla Travers |
| 9:2014cv00116 |
| February 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Washington |
| David E. Peebles |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Peebles, dkt. # 114 , is hereby ADOPTED; Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 93 , is hereby DENIED; Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 98 , is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 7/28/16. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
|
Filing
94
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED:the Court AFFIRMS Magistrate Judge Peebles' decision to allow plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint; and ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the recommendations contained in Magistrate Judge Peebles' August 21, 2015 Repor t, Recommendation, and Order (Dkt. No. 88 ). Accordingly, the parties' motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 49 , 70 ) are DENIED, without prejudice, as moot. The parties are given leave of thirty (30) days from the date of this Decision and Order to submit renewed motions for summary judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 9/23/15. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff} (nas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
