McClemore v. Bosco et al
| Antonio McClemore |
| Maureen Bosco, Corey Connelly, Kevin Boyer, Harold Berkinhimer, Michael Sacco, Anthony Gonzales, Joanne Waldron, Breggan and Gillani |
| 9:2014cv00626 |
| May 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Seneca |
| David E. Peebles |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER adopting 86 Report and Recommendations and granting in part and denying in part 79 Motion for Summary Judgment. All of the claims in Plaintiff's Complaint are DISMISSED except for the following claims that remain for trial: (1) a First Amendment free speech and expression claim against defendants Bosco, Conley, and Sacco, arising out of plaintiff's access to writing instruments and the telephone; (2) a First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Boyer with respect to plaintiff's ACW admission, physical threats and assault; and (3) an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Boyer. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/6/18. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER adopting 47 Report and Recommendations; denying 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/14/16 (served on plaintiff via regular mail). (rjb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
