Allah v. Rosati et al
| Kha'Sun Creator Allah |
| John Rosati, E. LaPan, T. LaFountain and J. Vandenburgh |
| 9:2014cv00788 |
| June 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Washington |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum directing the Superintendent of the above-named facility where KHA'SUN CREATOR ALLAH (DIN# 99-A-2660), is currently housed, or his deputies, to deliver sa id plaintiff to the Courthouse on the date and time specified above until the completion of this proceding. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 1/25/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail; Auburn C.F. and Great Meadow C.F. have been served via email by CRD)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER: ORDERED, Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum be issued to the Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, or his deputies, for KHA'SUN CREATOR ALLAH (DIN# 99-A-2660), the plaintiff in the above-entitled action, who is in their res pective custody and charge, to be produced at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 26, 2017 and each day thereafter for the duration of the Court proceeding, at the United States Courthouse at 445 Broadway, Courtroom No. 3, Albany, New York, for the purpo se of attending, and participating Mediation Session relative to the above-entitled case before the Honorable Christian F. Hummel. It appears that the plaintiff is presently incarcerated at Upstate Correctional Facility, and it is necessary that a W rit of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum be issued for the purpose of securing the presence of the plaintiff at said proceeding. It is expected that this proceeding will last approximately I day. ORDERED that a certified copy of this Order and said Writ be served via email and "certified mail - return receipt requested" upon the Superintendent of the named institution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 12/30/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER: On August 15, 2016, this Court appointed pro bono trial counsel for the Plaintiff. Dkt. No. 38. Shortly thereafter, Plaintiff's trial counsel requested that the Court conduct an in camera review of the Defendant's personnel files, Dkt. No. 39, and Defendants' counsel agreed to this procedure. On October 18, 2016, the personnel files for Defendants Rosati, LaPan, LaFountain, and Vandenburgh were delivered to the Court, and subsequently reviewed. Having conducted the revie w, the Court rules on each personnel file as set forth herein. The Court directs the Defendant's counsel to immediately retrieve from the Court's courtroom deputy, Maria Blunt, the Rosati, LaPan, LaFountain, and Vandenburgh personnel files. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 11/4/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER FOR TELEPHONE CONFERENCE: Participation of Inmate Kha'Sun Creator Allah (99-A-2660) is hereby ORDERED on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. for a telephone conference to be conducted by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. The Court will initiate the conference call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 6/14/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail, CRD served order on facility)(alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
