Morrison v. Lowry et al
| Scottie Morrison |
| R. Lowry, T. Lemery, K. Copeland and S. Baxter |
| 9:2014cv00800 |
| July 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Clinton |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting # 83 Magistrate Judge Stewart's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied. It is ordered that Pro Bono Counsel be appointed for the Plaintiff f or purposes of trial only; any appeal shall remain the responsibility of the plaintiff alone unless a motion for appointment of counsel for an appeal is granted; and upon assignment of Pro Bono Counsel, a final pretrial conference will be scheduled w ith counsel only, at which time the Court will schedule for trial Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Timothy Lemery, Sean Baxter and Kory Copeland, and a claim for failure to intervene against Defendant Robert Lowry. The parties are directed to appear at the final pretrial conference with settlement authority. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/23/16. (lmw)(Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
