Johnson v. Adams et al
| Johnathan Johnson |
| Richard Adams, Patrick Johnston, Nancy Smith, Lester Wright, Heath Baker and George Waterson |
| 9:2014cv00811 |
| July 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Franklin |
| David E. Peebles |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
JUDGMENT entered in accordance with the Order issued by Senior District Judge Gary L. Sharpe on November 8, 2016. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that Johnson's motion for remand (Dkt. No. 33 ) is DENIED. ORDERED that Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles' Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 39 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that defen dants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 19 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as indicated herein. ORDERED that Johnson's remaining claims are for: (1) deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment against Adams and Johnsto n for the period of February 2011 through August 2012; and (2) supervisory liability against Rock. ORDERED that Adams, Johnston, and Rock may all move for summary judgment by April 15, 2016. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/23/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
