Hill v. County of Montgomery et al
Plaintiff: Perry Hill
Defendant: County of Montgomery, Michael Amato and Michael Franko
Case Number: 9:2014cv00933
Filed: July 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 289 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT, APPROVAL OF CLASS COUNSEL'S FEES AND APPROVAL OF SERVICE AWARDS: It is ORDERED that the Motion for Final Approval (Dkt. Nos. 269 , 278 ) is GRANTED. It is further O RDERED that should the Class Claims Administrator receive notice of a Medicare lien pertaining to any Class Member that submitted a claim, payment by the administrator shall not be made to that Class Member until the lien issue is resolved with Medic are through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is further ORDERED that this Court expressly retains jurisdiction as to all matters relating to the administration, consummation, enforcement, and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement and of this Final Approval Order and the accompanying final judgment. It is further ORDERED that the entire case is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 6/2/2021. (nmk)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 259 ORDER that Plaintiffs are directed to file the revised Notice of Class Settlement and the revised Summary Notice by September 25, 2020. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/15/2020. (rjb, )
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 223 ORDER granting in part and denying in part the 200 and 207 Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 2/19/2020. (rjb, )
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 192 MEMORANDUM - DECISION AND ORDER that Defendants' objections are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 174 ) is DENIED; and that the Second Cause of Action is stricken from the Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 11/7/2019. (sal )
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER granting 106 Motion to Certify Class. ORDER that Plaintiffs Perry Hill and James Rogers are appointed the class representatives and that Plaintiffs' attorneys of record are appointed class counsel. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 8/20/18. (rjb, )
May 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER that the claim for injunctive and declaratory relief is DISMISSED without prejudice. Hill's motion for leave to file an amended complaint and Rogers' motion to intervene as a named plaintiff (Dkt. No. 106 ) are GRANTED for purposes o f: (1) adding Rogers as a Plaintiff with a Fourteenth Amendment and Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement damages claim, reflecting his status as both a pretrial detainee and convicted prisoner at MCJ; and (2) clarifying Hill's status as a pretrial detainee; and (3) clarifying that Plaintiffs seek certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3) and 23(c)(4); Hill's motion for leave to file an amended complaint and Rogers' motion to intervene (Dkt. No. 106 ) are otherwise DENIED . Hill may, by June 12, 2018, file: either (1) an amended complaint, as discussed supra; or (2) a second motion to amend and to intervene for purposes of adding a plaintiff with standing to pursue a claim for injunctive and declaratory relief. If suc h a motion is filed, the Court will consider it, along with any response by Defendants, which must be filed by June 19, 2018, together with the pending motion for class certification. If Hill elects not to file such a motion, the Court will consider the motion for class certification based on the amended complaint and any further briefing. If Plaintiffs seek certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3) and 23(c)(4), Plaintiffs must file a letter brief addressing the requirements in Rule 23(b)(3), by June 19, 2018, and Defendants may file a letter brief in response by June 26, 2018. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 5/29/18. (rjb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. County of Montgomery et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Perry Hill
Represented By: Maria K. Dyson
Represented By: Elmer R. Keach, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Montgomery
Represented By: Jonathan M. Bernstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Amato
Represented By: Jonathan M. Bernstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Franko
Represented By: Jonathan M. Bernstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?