McMillian v. Graham et al
| Herman Carlee McMillian |
| H. Graham, Vince, 1-10 Correction Officer and Robert Thomas Johnson |
| 9:2015cv00241 |
| March 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
JUDGMENT entered pursuant to the Decision and Order and Order to Show Cause of the Honorable Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby, dated the 9th day of February, 2018. (served on plaintiff by regular and certified mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
122
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that defendants' motion to strike (Dkt. No. 120 ) is DENIED. ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. Nos. 118 , 119 , and 121 ) are DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 10/31/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
114
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. Nos. 109 , 110 , 112 , and 113 ) are DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/6/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
94
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 92 ) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 12/13/16. (Copy served via regular mail on plaintiff)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
88
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that defendant's motion (Dkt. No. 78 ) for consolidation of the present case with McMillian II is GRANTED. ORDERED that this action be consolidated, for all purposes, with McMillian v. Ramsey ("McMillian II&qu ot;), No. 9:15-CV-1303, for all further proceedings. This present action shall be designated as the Lead Case, and McMillian II shall be designated as the Member Case. ALL FUTURE SUBMISSIONS SHALL NOW BE FILED IN THE LEAD CASE ONLY. Except as ordere d herein below, there shall be no further filings in the Member Case. The Clerk is ordered to correct the dockets to reflect this consolidation. ORDERED that the Clerk shall reassign McMillian II to the undersigned as presiding District Judge and t o the Honorable Daniel J. Steward as presiding Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court place a copy of this Decision and Order in the file of McMillian II. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall make copies of the Complaint and t he Answer from McMillian II and shall docket them respectively as the Consolidated Complaint and the Consolidated Answer in this, the Lead Case. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall edit the docket in the Lead Case to include the following add itional defendants: (1) Correction Officer Ramsey and (2) Daniel Walters, also known as Correction Officer Walter, formerly known as Walter Doe. ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. Nos. 84 , 87 ) are DENIED. ORDERED that the Clerk shall refer this consolidated action to the assigned Magistrate Judge to reset the relevant pretrial deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 10/25/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
67
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 53 ) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/2/16. (served on plaintiff with dkt. nos. 2, 15, and docket report by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
