O'Daniel v. Martuscello
Petitioner: William O'Daniel
Respondent: Daniel Martuscello, Jr.
Case Number: 9:2015cv01183
Filed: October 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 16 Report and Recommendation is adopted in whole. ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and a Certificate of Appealability is ISSUED concerning only petitioner's Sixth Amendment choice-of-counsel claim. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/19/18. (nas )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Daniel v. Martuscello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William O'Daniel
Represented By: Bruce R. Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel Martuscello, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?