LaPierre v. LaValley et al
Plaintiff: Mark A. LaPierre
Defendant: E. LaValley, Sergeant Delisle, Terry Guynup, Catherine Leahy-Scott, Anthony J. Annucci and Krishna Vadlamudi
Case Number: 9:2015cv01499
Filed: December 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge: Daniel J. Stewart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart's August 26, 2019 Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 96 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motio n for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 79 ) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Defendants' favor and close this case. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/26/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 96 REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: It is hereby RECOMMENDED, that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 79 ) be GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court s erve a copy of this Report-Recommendation and Order upon the parties to this action. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties have fourteen (14) days within which to file written objections to the foregoing report. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court. FAILURE TO OBJECT TO THIS REPORT WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS WILL PRECLUDE APPELLATE REVIEW. (Objections to R&R due by 9/12/2019, Case Review Deadline 9/16/2019). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 8/26/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
May 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 45 ) is DENIED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 5/18/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
April 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 AMENDED ORDER for Telephone Conference: Participation of Inmate Mark A. LaPierre (15-A-1283) is hereby ORDERED on Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. for a telephone conference to be conducted by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. The Court will initiate the conference call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 4/7/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail; facility served by CRD)(alh, )
April 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER for Telephone Conference: Participation of Inmate Mark A. LaPierre (15-A-1283) is hereby ORDERED on Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. for a telephone conference to be conducted by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. The Court will initiate the conference call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 4/6/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail; facility served by CRD)(alh, )
August 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 28 is DENIED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 8/23/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaPierre v. LaValley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark A. LaPierre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. LaValley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergeant Delisle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Guynup
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Catherine Leahy-Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony J. Annucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Krishna Vadlamudi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?