Robinson v. Uhler
Plaintiff: Dequan K. Robinson
Defendant: Donald G. Uhler
Case Number: 9:2016cv00232
Filed: February 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Presiding Judge: Daniel J. Stewart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 24 Report and Recommendation is accepted in whole. ORDERED that 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is granted. ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/13/17. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Uhler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dequan K. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald G. Uhler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?