Rucano v. Koenigsmann et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Rucano
Defendant: Carl J. Koenigsmann, Mary D'Silva, Jane Doe, Michael Kirkpatrick, Vonda Johnson, Excelsa Serabian, Edward Marra and Officer Ramirez
Case Number: 9:2016cv00438
Filed: April 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Clinton
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 124 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that plaintiff's motions for the appointment of an expert witness and for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 123 ) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL AT A LATER TIME AS DISCUSSED ABOVE. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 3/16/18. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
March 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 119 ) is GRANTED IN PART as noted herein. Plaintiff's motion to compel is otherwise DENIED for the reasons stated on the record by the court during the March 9, 2018 c onference. It is further ORDERED that discovery remains open only for the limited purpose of the defendants complying with this order, and that the dispositive motion deadline is reset to May 11, 2018. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 3/9/2018. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail.] (nmk)
November 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion for permission to amend (Dkt. No. 33 ) is DENIED. ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion for a Valentin Order (Dkt. No. 34 ) is DENIED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 11/30/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
September 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 24 ) together with the supporting exhibits (Dkt. No. 1-1) is accepted for filing and is deemed the operative pleading. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to create a ne w docket entry for the amended complaint. ORDERED that plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims related to his dental/medical treatment at Great Meadow C.F. are DISMISSED. ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue a summonses and forward them, along wi th copies of the amended complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon the remaining defendants. The Clerk shall forward a copy of the summonses and amended complaint to the Office of the New York Attorney General, together with a copy of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that a response to the amended complaint be filed by defendants, or their counsel, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/15/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rucano v. Koenigsmann et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Rucano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl J. Koenigsmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary D'Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Kirkpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vonda Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Excelsa Serabian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Marra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?