Trowell v. Upstate Correctional Facility et al
Plaintiff: Ramzidden Trowell
Defendant: Santamore and Does 1-5
Case Number: 9:2016cv00639
Filed: June 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 JUDGMENT entered pursuant to the Order of the Honorable Judge Mae A. D'Agostino, dated the 20th day of March 2018. (served on plaintiff by regular and certified mail) (alh, )
December 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to supplement the complaint (Dkt. No. 8 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to create a new docket entry incorporating the original c omplaint (Dkt. No. 1) with the supplemental complaint (Dkt. No. 8) and entitle the entry, "Amended Complaint". ORDERED that the amended complaint shall be the operative pleading in this action. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is also directed to amend the docket to include Fleury as a defendant. ORDERED that the following claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a cause of action: (1) Eighth Amendment claims related to threats; (2) Eighth Amendment excessive force cla ims; (3) Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims related to plaintiff's medical needs; and (4) retaliation claims. ORDERED, that a response to the amended complaint be filed by defendant Santamore, or his counsel, as provided for i n the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ORDERED, that the Clerk shall issue a summons and forward it, along with copies of the amended complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon Fleury. The Clerk shall forward a copy of the summons and amended complaint to the Office of the New York Attorney General, together with a copy of this Decision and Order. ORDERED, that a response to the amended complaint be filed by Fleury, or his counsel, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. Nos. 11 and 12 ) is DENIED with leave to renew. ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Dkt. Nos. 11 and 12 ) is DENIED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 12/7/16. (Copy mailed to Pro Se party and therefore, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d), an additional 3 (three) days for service may be allowed)(alh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trowell v. Upstate Correctional Facility et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramzidden Trowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santamore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?