Rodriguez v. Griffin

Rodriguez v. Griffin

Petitioner:	Jose A. Rodriguez
Respondent:	Thomas Griffin
Case Number:	9:2016cv01037
Filed:	August 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 11, 2018	Filing 52 JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action in accordance with the 12/11/18 Decision and Order of Judge Hurd. {judgment served via regular mail on petitioner} (nas, )
April 5, 2017	Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that; 1. Petitioner's motion to amend his petition, Dkt. No. 26 , is GRANTED; 2. Petitioner's motion to stay his amended habeas petition, Dkt. No. 27 , is GRANTED; 3. The Clerk shall send to petitioner a copy of the signature page of his proposed amended petition (Dkt. No. 26-1, at 37). Petitioner must sign and date the signature page and return it to this Court by no later than thirty (30) days after the filing date of this Decision and Order; 4. Upon receipt of the signed and dated signature page, the Clerk shall file the proposed amended petition (Dkt. No. 26-1) as an amended petition; 5. Petitioner must advise the Court in writing, every thirty (30) days, of the status of the pending sta te court application, include the date upon which any decision is reached; 6. Within thirty (30) days of the date upon which the final state court capable of reviewing petitioner's application reaches a decision, petitioner must notify the Cou rt of that decision; 7. If petitioner fails to comply with the terms of this Order, the stay shall be immediately lifted and the file returned to the Court for further proceedings; 8. No response to the amended petition will be required until petitioner completes exhaustion of his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim and the stay is lifted. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/5/17. (served on petitioner with dkt. no. 26-1 by regular mail) (alh, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 11, 2018

Filing 52 JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action in accordance with the 12/11/18 Decision and Order of Judge Hurd. {judgment served via regular mail on petitioner} (nas, )

April 5, 2017

Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that; 1. Petitioner's motion to amend his petition, Dkt. No. 26 , is GRANTED; 2. Petitioner's motion to stay his amended habeas petition, Dkt. No. 27 , is GRANTED; 3. The Clerk shall send to petitioner a copy of the signature page of his proposed amended petition (Dkt. No. 26-1, at 37). Petitioner must sign and date the signature page and return it to this Court by no later than thirty (30) days after the filing date of this Decision and Order; 4. Upon receipt of the signed and dated signature page, the Clerk shall file the proposed amended petition (Dkt. No. 26-1) as an amended petition; 5. Petitioner must advise the Court in writing, every thirty (30) days, of the status of the pending sta te court application, include the date upon which any decision is reached; 6. Within thirty (30) days of the date upon which the final state court capable of reviewing petitioner's application reaches a decision, petitioner must notify the Cou rt of that decision; 7. If petitioner fails to comply with the terms of this Order, the stay shall be immediately lifted and the file returned to the Court for further proceedings; 8. No response to the amended petition will be required until petitioner completes exhaustion of his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim and the stay is lifted. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/5/17. (served on petitioner with dkt. no. 26-1 by regular mail) (alh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Griffin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose A. Rodriguez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas Griffin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?