Roache v. Sullivan et al
| Walter J. Roache |
| Ann Marie Sullivan and New York State Office of Mental Health |
| 9:2016cv01069 |
| September 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Oneida |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action pursuant to the September 12, 2019 Memorandum Decision of Judge Singleton. {Judgment served via regular mail on petitioner}. (rep)
|
|
Filing
35
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that petitioner's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 34 , is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/9/17. (served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure With Opportunity to Comply With Filing Fee Requirements: ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wan ts to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 9/6/16. (served on petitioner with form by regular mail)(alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
