Stanford v. Griffin
| Jahteek Stanford |
| Thomas Griffin |
| 9:2016cv01160 |
| September 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Dutchess |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
JUDGMENT entered pursuant to the Memorandum Decision of the Honorable Judge James K. Singleton, dated the 10th day of April, 2018. (served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
18
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the stay in this action is immediately lifted and this action is returned to the Court's active docket. ORDERED that if petitioner wants add any new claim(s) to his pending habeas petition, he must file and serve upon the respondent a motion to amend his original petition, pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.1, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order. Petitioner must also attach a pr oposed amended petition setting forth all of the claims that he wants this Court to consider, including the claims now raised in the petition and any new claim(s) petitioner wants to add to the petition. Petitioner must also demonstrate either tha t his proposed amended petition is timely, or that it "relates back" to his original petition (Dkt. No. 9). ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send petitioner a blank section 2254 habeas petition which he should use for his proposed am ended petition. ORDERED that upon filing by petitioner of any motion to amend his petition, the Clerk is directed to return the file to the Court for further review. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/12/17. (served on petitioner with blank form by regular mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
15
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to stay the petition (Dkt. No. 11 ) is GRANTED. ORDERED Petitioner must continually advise the Court, in writing every thirty (30) days, of the status of the pending state court proceedin gs, including the date upon which any decision(s) are reached. ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date upon which the final state court capable of reviewing Petitioner's applications has reached a decision, Petitioner must notify the Court of that decision. ORDERED, that if petitioner fails to comply with the terms of this Order, the stay shall be immediately lifted and the file returned to the Court for further proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 4/4/17. (served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stanford v. Griffin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jahteek Stanford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Thomas Griffin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
