Reeder v. Annucci et al
| Raszell Reeder |
| Anthony Annucci, Donald Uhler, P. Drumm, Captain Zerniak, D. Bernier, Borrough, Locke, Welch, Sgt. Fletcher, Sgt. Smith, Sgt. Satimore, Sgt. Rodier, Captain Bishop, V. Kumar and E. Bell |
| 9:2016cv01161 |
| September 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Franklin |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Daniel J. Stewart |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
JUDGMENT: Entered dismissing the action, with prejudice, pursuant to the Memorandum-Decision and Order of the Honorable Judge Mae A. D'Agostino, dated September 26, 2019. (Copy served via regular mail) (rep)
|
|
Filing
94
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 89 ) is DENIED as moot. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 92 ) is DENIED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/12/18. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER: ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Stewart's Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 41 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 29 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/22/18. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
