Hayes v. Dahkle et al
| Taheen Hayes |
| Jason A. Meier, Gregory E. Langtry, Stephen A. Bence, E. Coon and K. Hoffman |
| 9:2016cv01368 |
| November 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Franklin |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
JUDGMENT dismissing the action pursuant to Decision and Order of Judge Thomas J. McAvoy filed February 19, 2019. (Judgment mailed to plaintiff via regular mail). (rar, )
|
|
Filing
37
DECISION & ORDER: The Court ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hummel's October 27, 2017 33 Report-Recommendation and Order IN PART, and MODIFIES IT IN PART in accordance with this decision. Accordingly, defendants' partial motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 26 ) is GRANTED: (1) insofar as it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's claims against C.O. Dahkle, C.O. Hoffman, and C.O. Meier for verbal harassment and/or threats, (2) insofar as it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's supervisor y liability claims against Supt. Martuscello for C.O. Dahkle's verbal harassment and/or threats. and (3) insofar as it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claims against C.O. Langtry, C.O. Bence, and C.O. Coon. Thes e claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, Defendants' partial motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 26 ) is DENIED: (1) Insofar as it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against C.O. Dahkle for sexual assault, (2) Inso far as it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's claims against Supt. Martuscello for verbal harassment and/or threats, (3) Insofar as it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's First Amendment claims against C.O. Meier and C.O. Hoffman for retaliation, and (4) Insofar as it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's supervisory liability claims against Supt. Martuscello and DSS Shanley for C.O. Meier's retaliation. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 1/19/18. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
11
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 8 ), and all exhibits annexed (Dkt. Nos.1-1 and 8-1) thereto is accepted for filing and is deemed the operative pleading. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to creat e a new docket entry for the amended complaint. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall amend the docket to include Dahkle, Martuscello, Shanley and Iarrusso as defendants herein. ORDERED that the following claims are DISMISSED pursuant to U.S .C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted: (1) plaintiff's retaliation claim against Dahkle related to the alleged sexual assault in April 2016; and (2) plaintiff' s claim that Iarrusso violated his constitutional rights when he failed to follow DOCCS Directives. ORDERED, that the following claims survive this Court's initial review and require a response: (1) Eighth Amendment claims against Dahkle re lated to the April 15, 2016 incident; (2) Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Meier, Bence, Coon, and Langtry; (3) First Amendment retaliation claims against Dahkle, Hoffman, Meier, Bence, Coon, Langtry, Iarrusso, and Martuscello; and (4) supervisory claims against Martuscello and Shanley. ORDERED, that a response to the amended complaint be filed by defendants Hoffman, Meier, Bence, and Coon or their counsel, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ORDERED, that the Clerk shall issue summonses for remaining defendants, Dahkle, Iarrusso, Martuscello, Langtry, and Shanley and forward them, along with copies of the amended complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon the defendants. The Cle rk shall forward a copy of the summonses and amended complaint to the Office of the New York Attorney General, together with a copy of this Decision and Order. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 1/26/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
