Santana v. Racette et al
| Ricco Santana |
| Steven Racette, John Doe #1, John Does #2-6, John Doe #7 and John Does #8-10 |
| 9:2017cv00102 |
| January 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Clinton |
| David E. Peebles |
| Brenda K. Sannes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER that the parties' joint request for the entry of a sealing order for Docket Numbers 65-4, 65-6, and 65-9, (Dkt. Nos. 67 , 69 ), is granted in part; the clerk of court is instructed to change the restriction on the docket for Docket Num bers 65-4, 65-6, and 65-9 to sealed. Defendants are directed to submit a separate, redacted version of Docket Number 65-6, for public filing, by July 10, 2020, as follows: pages 5-8 and 99-101 should be refiled without alteration; pages 71-98 shou ld be refiled with personal identifiers redacted in accordance with N.D.N.Y Local Rule 8.1; finally, placeholder pages should be submitted for pages 1-4 and 9-70 with a notation on each page "Filed with the Court under seal". Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 58 ) is granted and the second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 33 ) is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 6/22/2020. (rjb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
