Smith v. Russo et al
Plaintiff: Andrew Smith
Defendant: Pat Russo, Fricke and Edward Blie
Case Number: 9:2017cv00244
Filed: March 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Rensselaer
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 142 JUDICIALLY NOTICED FACTS. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 10/14/2022. (sal )
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 136 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER that the parties' motions in limine, (Dkt. Nos. 113 , 124 , 127 , 128 ), are granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 10/12/2022. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail)(sal)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 83 DECISION AND ORDER: The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the recommendation in the Report-Recommendation and Order, Dkt. No. 76 , for the reasons stated therein. Thus, the Court finds that the doctrine of fraudulent concealment does not apply to any claim s Plaintiff may have from his incarceration at RCCF between June 8, 2012 and June 17, 2013. This case may now proceed to trial on the question of whether Dr. Fricke engaged in deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical need at a time within the statute of limitations. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on March 31, 2021. (Copy served via regular mail on plaintiff).(rep)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 64 DECISION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Defendant's objections to the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Dancks, dkt. # 59 , are hereby OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part. The Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 58 , is hereby ACCEPTE D and ADOPTED insofar as Magistrate Judge Dancks concludes that Defendant's motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 51 , should be DENIED. The Court will REMAND the case to the Magistrate Judge for briefing and a Report- Recommendation on the iss ue of whether the doctrine of fraudulent concealment applies to any claims Plaintiff may have for his incarceration between June 8, 2012 and June 17, 2013. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on September 23, 2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(rep)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Russo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pat Russo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fricke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Blie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?