Renert v. Eckert

Renert v. Eckert

Petitioner:	Barry M. Renert
Respondent:	Stewart Eckert
Case Number:	9:2017cv00697
Filed:	June 28, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
County:	Erie
Presiding Judge:	Christian F. Hummel
Presiding Judge:	David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 22, 2020	Filing 14 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that petitioner's petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED pursuant to the June 22, 2020 Memorandum Decision of Judge James K. Singleton; and ORDERED that the Court decl ines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 705 (2004) ("To obtain a certificate of appealability, a prisoner must 'demonstrat[e] that jurists of reason could disagree with the di strict court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'" (quoting Miller-El, 537 U.S. at 327)). Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Court of Appeals. See FED. R. APP. P. 22(b); 2D CIR. R. 22.1. (Copy served via regular mail) (rep) (Main Document 14 replaced on 6/22/2020) (rep, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

June 22, 2020

Filing 14 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that petitioner's petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED pursuant to the June 22, 2020 Memorandum Decision of Judge James K. Singleton; and ORDERED that the Court decl ines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 705 (2004) ("To obtain a certificate of appealability, a prisoner must 'demonstrat[e] that jurists of reason could disagree with the di strict court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'" (quoting Miller-El, 537 U.S. at 327)). Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Court of Appeals. See FED. R. APP. P. 22(b); 2D CIR. R. 22.1. (Copy served via regular mail) (rep) (Main Document 14 replaced on 6/22/2020) (rep, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Renert v. Eckert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Barry M. Renert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Stewart Eckert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?