Jackson v. County of Onondaga et al
| Aaron C. Jackson |
| County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Department of Corrections, John Doe, M.D., Jane Doe, M.D., John Doe, R.N. and Jane Doe, R.N. |
| 9:2017cv00845 |
| August 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Onondaga |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
SUMMARY ORDER - That Jackson's motion to substitute a deceased party (Dkt. No. 54) is GRANTED. That the Clerk is directed to amend the caption of this matter to reflect that Robin McCray, Administratix of the Estate of Aaron C. Jackson, is substituted as plaintiff. That defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 38) is GRANTED. That McCray's cross-motion to amend his amended complaint (Dkt. No. 41) is DENIED. That McCray's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 32) is DISMISSED. That the Clerk close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/21/2020. (jel, )
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That County defendants' 14 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. That Jackson's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. That Jackson shall file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, and the Clerk shall close this case without any further Order should he fail to do so. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/28/2019. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
