Resto-Otero v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Michael Resto-Otero
Defendant: Elma Doe, Doe(s) and New York State DOCCS
Case Number: 9:2017cv01115
Filed: October 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action in accordance with the 10/25/19 Decision and Order of Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe.{judgment served via regular mail on plaintiff} (nas)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 44 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice UNLESS, within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of this Decision and Order, plaintiff files a written objection to the dismissal with prejudice. The Clerk shall retain plaintif f's motion to voluntarily dismiss this action (Dkt. No. 42 ) for twenty (20) days from the filing date of this Decision and Order. If plaintiff does not file an objection to dismissal of this action with prejudice within twenty days, the follow ing will occur: (1) plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss this action (Dkt. No. 42 ) will be granted and the action will be dismissed with prejudice; (2) the Clerk will enter Judgment dismissing this action with prejudice, without further O rder of this Court, and close this case; and (3) defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 40 ) will be denied as moot. ORDERED that, if plaintiff files an objection to the dismissal of this action with prejudice within the required time period, the Clerk shall return the file to this Court for further review. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/19/19. ( Notice of Compliance Deadline 10/9/2019){order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER: ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 26 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 21 ) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/5/18. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Resto-Otero v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Resto-Otero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elma Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe(s)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York State DOCCS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?