Maldonado v. Mandalaywala et al
Plaintiff: Shain Maldonado
Defendant: Vijaykumar S. Mandalaywala, Nancy Smith, Denise M. Reome and Derick McFaul
Case Number: 9:2017cv01303
Filed: November 29, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge: Brenda K. Sannes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER that Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Defendant Bennett (Dkt. No. 46 ) is granted, and Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Bennett is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to exhaust adm inistrative remedies and the Doe Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with a court order and failure to serve. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 2/22/2021. (Copy served on pltf via regular mail)(rjb, )
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER adopting 58 Report and Recommendations and granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Defendants Mandalaywala and the Superintendent of Great Meado w, and they are DISMISSED from this action; Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice as to D. Bennett, and an exhaustion hearing will be scheduled on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against D. Bennett. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/10/2020. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER adopting the 38 Report and Recommendations and denying the 24 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 1/8/2019. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maldonado v. Mandalaywala et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shain Maldonado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vijaykumar S. Mandalaywala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Denise M. Reome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derick McFaul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?