Harden v. Fields

Petitioner: Anthony C. Harden
Respondent: Leroy Fields
Case Number: 9:2018cv00162
Filed: February 8, 2018
Court: New York Northern District Court
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Dutchess
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Referring Judge: Christian F. Hummel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 17, 2018 19 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that petitioner's motion to conduct a Sparman hearing (Dkt. No. 14 ) is DENIED. ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to produce the verdict sheet (Dkt. No. 16 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 9/17/18. {order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harden v. Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony C. Harden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Leroy Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?