Burgos v. Tromblay
Plaintiff: Miguel Burgos
Defendant: Tromblay
Case Number: 9:2018cv00333
Filed: March 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Clinton
Presiding Judge: Andrew T Baxter
Referring Judge: Gary L Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2018 Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Miguel Burgos. (nas, )
March 19, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Miguel Burgos. (nas, )
March 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Miguel Burgos filed by Miguel Burgos. (Attachments: #1 letter; civil cover sheet, #2 envelope)(nas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burgos v. Tromblay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miguel Burgos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tromblay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?