Young v. Shipman et al
| Jeffrey Young |
| R. Sawyer and S. Shipman |
| 9:2018cv00782 |
| July 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Clinton |
| David E Peebles |
| Brenda K Sannes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee for civil actions or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate official at his facility. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 7/2/18. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Jeffrey Young. (nas, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jeffrey Young.(nas, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R. Sawyer, S. Shipman filed by Jeffrey Young. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 envelope)(nas, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
