Baker v. The State of New York et al
Petitioner: Christopher Baker, Jr.
Respondent: Deborah McCulloch and The State of New York
Case Number: 9:2018cv01048
Filed: September 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E Kahn
Referring Judge: Daniel J Stewart
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order, the Petition (Dkt. No. 1), memorandum of law (Dkt. No. 1-1), exhibits (Dkt. No. 1-2), the Court's September 25, 2018, Decision and Order (Dkt. No. 4), and Petitioner's affirmation (Dkt. No. 5) upon Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Local Rule 72.4(e). ORDERED that Respondent shall file and serve an answer to the Petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that Petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of Respondent's answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 10/29/18.[response due by Deborah McCulloch served on 10/30/2018, answer due 1/28/2019; The State of New York served on 10/30/2018, answer due 1/28/2019] (Attachments: #1 petition, #2 memo of law, #3 exhibits, #4 December Order (dkt. no. 4), #5 affirmation){served as directed}(nas, )
October 26, 2018 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT in response to #4 Order by Christopher Baker, Jr. (nas, )
September 25, 2018 Filing 4 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that Petitioner may file a written affirmation, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, explaining why the statute of limitations should not bar this Petition. The affirmation shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages in length. Petitioner should state the date(s) upon which he filed any state court applications for relief in which he challenged his conviction, including the name and location of the court(s) in which he filed each application, and the date(s) upon which the application(s) were denied. If Petitioner is asking the court to equitably toll the limitations period, he must set forth facts establishing a basis for the application of equitable tolling as stated above. If Petitioner is asking the Court to apply an equitable exception to the limitations period, he must set forth facts establishing a basis for doing so. No answer to the Petition will be required from the Respondent until Petitioner has submitted the required affirmation, and the Court has had the opportunity to review his arguments. ORDERED, that upon Petitioner's submission of the written affirmation, the Clerk shall forward the entire file to the Court for review. ORDERED, that if Petitioner fails to submit the required affirmation, this Petition shall be dismissed as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d) with no further order from the Court. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 9/25/18. ( Notice of Compliance Deadline 10/26/2018, Case Review Deadline 11/26/2018)(served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TEXT ORDER RE: #2 Based on petitioner's IFP Application, he is eligible to proceed with this action without paying the statutory filing fee. His IFP Application is therefore GRANTED. Petitioner will still be required to pay fees that he may incur in the future regarding this action, including but not limited to copying fees ($.50 per page). Authorized by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 9/10/18. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas, )
September 4, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Christopher Baker, Jr.(alh, )
September 4, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher Baker, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Envelope)(alh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker v. The State of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Deborah McCulloch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Baker, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?