Powell v. Zurlo
Petitioner: James Powell
Respondent: Michael Zurlo
Case Number: 9:2018cv01163
Filed: September 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Glenn T Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed IFP (Dkt. No. #4 ) is GRANTED. ORDERED that petitioner may file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that, if petitioner does not file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further order. ORDERED that, upon the filing of any amended petition, the Clerk shall forward the file in this matter to the Court for further review. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 10/17/18. ( Notice of Compliance Deadline 11/19/2018, Case Review Deadline 12/18/2018){order served via regular mail on petitioner} (nas, )
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 10/9/18. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas, )
October 9, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Powell. (nas, )
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that petitioner's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/26/18. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas, )
September 26, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Powell. (nas, )
September 26, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James Powell.(nas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Powell v. Zurlo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Zurlo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?