Newman v. Herzog et al
||July 12, 2019
||US District Court for the Northern District of New York
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 12, 2019
DECISION & ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 53 in 3:17-cv-918) is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs claims seeking damages against Annucci and Herzog, including his claims under New York law, are DISMISSED without leave to amend for the reasons stated herein and in the Report-Recommendation; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs constitutional claims challenging his conditions of post-release supervision SURVIVE sua sponte revi ew and require a response; and it is further ORDERED, that this action is CONSOLIDATED with Newman v. Stanford, Case No. 9:19-CV-118. All future filings shall be made in this case, No. 3:17-CV-918, which shall be designated as the Lead Case; and it is further ORDERED, that John S. Wallenstein Esq., 1100 Franklin Ave. # 100, Garden City, New York 11530, is appointed under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) to represent Plaintiff/Petitioner in these consolidated cases. The Clerk is directed to prepa re the appropriate CJA 20 form (Appointment of and Authority to Pay Court Appointed Counsel) to accomplish the foregoing; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall, as soon as practicable but no later than thirty days from the date of this Decision and Order, file a letter confirming his current address. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 12, 2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(sas)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?