Gee v. Annucci et al
| Carl Gee |
| J. Johnston, Marlow, Dumas, Lancto, B. Yelich and Anthony Annucci |
| 9:2019cv00176 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. ORDERED that, if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must, within thirty (30) days from the date of the filing of this Decision and Order, file an Amended Complaint correcting the pleading defects identified in this Decision and Order. ORDERED that, if Plaintiff timely files an Amended Complaint, this matter be returned to the Court for further review. ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to timely file an Amended Complaint correcting the pleading defects identified in this Decision and Order, this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice (except to the extent his claims seek his release, in which case the claims are DISMISSED without prejudice) without further order of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In that event, the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 4/11/19. {order and copy of complaint served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
|
| Notification to Superintendent of Filing - Provided Superintendent at Bare Hill Correctional Facility with notice of instant action and a copy of Plaintiff's #4 Inmate Authorization Form. USDC/NYND Finance Dept notified. (rar, ) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/19/19. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas )
|
| Filing 4 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Carl Gee. (nas, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee for civil actions or (2) submit a signed Inmate Authorization Form. ORDERED that upon plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/12/2019. (Order and blank Inmate Authorization form mailed to plaintiff). (rar, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Carl Gee. (rar, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Annucci, Dumas, J. Johnston, Lancto, Marlow, B. Yelich filed by Carl Gee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits A, B and C, #3 Exhibits D, E, F. G. H, #4 Exhibits I, J, K and L, #5 envelope) (rar, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
