Morgan v. Downstate Correctional Facility
Plaintiff: Dante Morgan and Memphis Dante Morgan
Defendant: Downstate Correctional Facility
Case Number: 9:2019cv00294
Filed: March 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: David E Peebles
Referring Judge: Glenn T Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2019 Filing 5 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Dante Morgan. (rar, )
March 29, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dante Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Account Statement, #2 envelope)(rar, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 3/29/2019 with redacted version) (rar, ).
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket.Authorized by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/29/2019. (Text Order mailed to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee for civil actions or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate official at his facility and a signed Inmate Authorization Form. ORDERED that upon plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/5/2019 and filed on 3/6/2019. (Order, blank IFP Application and Inmate Authorization form mailed to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar, )
March 4, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Downstate Correctional Facility filed by Dante Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Affidavit of Service, #5 envelope) (rar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan v. Downstate Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dante Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Memphis Dante Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Downstate Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?