Ford v. State of New York et al
| Kavon Ford Ttee and Kavon Ford |
| Anthony Annucci, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and State of New York |
| 9:2019cv00380 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| David N Hurd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USCA Case Number 19-1380 for #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Kavon Ford. (nas, ) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC NOTICE AND CERTIFICATION sent to US Court of Appeals re #10 Notice of Appeal. (rar) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Decision and Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kavon Ford. (rar) |
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT dismissing the action, with prejudice, pursuant to Decision and Order dated 4/29/2019 of District Judge David N. Hurd. (Judgment mailed to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar, ) |
Filing 8
DECISION AND ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's IFP Application (Dkt. No. #5 ) is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) because plaintiff has "three strikes" and is not entitled to the "imminent danger" exception; 2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(A) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, without leave to replead. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/29/2019.(Decision and Order mailed to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar, )
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Ford asking for IFP application and Inmate Authorization form. (rar, ) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/8/19. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kavon Ford. (nas, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee for civil actions or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate official at his facility. ORDERED that upon plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/1/2019. (Order and blank IFP application mailed to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar)
|
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Kavon Ford Ttee. (rar, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kavon Ford Ttee.(rar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Annucci, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, State of New York filed by Kavon Ford Ttee. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Interest, #2 envelope) (rar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
