Robinson v. Capra
| Alfred Robinson |
| Michael Capra and Christopher Miller |
| 9:2019cv00696 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Clerk update the caption to reflect the correct respondent's name. ORDERED, that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the petition upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Local Rule 72.4(e). ORDERED, that the respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED, that petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent's answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 6/18/19. (Attachments: #1 petition, #2 memo of law)[ response due by Christopher Miller served on 6/18/2019, answer due 9/16/2019]{served as directed}(nas)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00- receipt #SYR055188 ) filed by Alfred Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 envelope)(nas, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
