Rutigliano v. LaManna
| Danielle Rutigliano |
| A. LaManna |
| 9:2019cv00745 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| David E Peebles |
| Gary L Sharpe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: Petitioner' renewed IFP Application, Dkt. No. #9 , is denied as moot because, on June 25, 2019, petitioner properly re-commenced this action by paying the required filing fee ($5.00). Respondent is reminded she has until September 24, 2019 to file her answer. At that time, the Court will set a deadline for petitioner's reply which petitioner may, but is not required to file. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 7/31/19. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Danielle Rutigliano.(nas, ) |
| Updated copy of docket sheet provided to petitioner. (nas, ) |
| Filing 8 Letter from Rutiglano inquiring as to status. (nas, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 7/1/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(jdp, )
|
|
Filing 6
DECISION AND ORDER directing response to the #1 Habeas Corpus Petition filed by Danielle Rutigliano within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. Petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent's answer. Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. #3 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (A. LaManna served on 6/26/2019, answer due 9/24/2019). Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 6/26/2019. (Copy served upon petitioner via regular mail). (sal ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/21/2019: #1 petition) (nas, ).
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/25/19. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
|
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number alb011415 (nas, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that petitioner's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/21/19. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Danielle Rutigliano. (nas) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Danielle Rutigliano. (nas, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Danielle Rutigliano. (Attachments: #1 affidavit of service, #2 envelope)(nas, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rutigliano v. LaManna | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: A. LaManna | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Danielle Rutigliano | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
