Goad v. Bell
Gary G. Goad and Gary Glen Goad |
Earl Bell |
9:2019cv00965 |
August 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Mae A D'Agostino |
Daniel J Stewart |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis A. Rambaud on behalf of Earl Bell (Rambaud, Dennis) |
Filing 9 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that petitioner's application for bail (Dkt. No. #8 ) is DENIED. The Court again makes no determination regarding the merits of any of the claims raised in the petition. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/16/19. {order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas) |
Filing 8 Motion from Gary G. Goad requesting temporary parole until a determination is made in this action. (nas, ) |
Filing 7 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Petitioner's motion for the Court to appoint him counsel, Dkt. No. #4 , is DENIED without prejudice. ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the petition upon Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Local Rule 72.4(e). ORDERED that the Respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that Petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of Respondent's answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 9/3/19. (Attachments: #1 petition and affidavit)[response due by Earl Bell served on 9/3/2019, answer due 12/2/2019]{served as directed}(nas ) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 8/19/19. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas, ) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SYR055647 (nas, ) |
Filing 5 Submission in support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Gary G. Goad. (Attachments: #1 cover letter; envelope)(nas, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Gary G. Goad. (nas, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: It is hereby ORDERED that petitioner's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete; and it is further ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action; and it is further ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 8/7/2019. (Copy served via regular mail along with blank forms)(meb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gary G. Goad. (meb) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gary G. Goad. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Mailing Envelope)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.