Partee v. Jones et al
| Cedric Partee and Cedric Webb |
| New York Division of Parole and David Jones |
| 9:2019cv01198 |
| September 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve copies of this Decision & Order and the petition upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Local Rule 72.4(e); and it is further ORDERED, that the respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision & Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 9/30/2019. [Response due by David Jones served on 9/30/2019, answer due 12/30/2019; New York Division of Parole served on 9/30/2019, answer due 12/30/2019] (Attachments: #1 Petition)(Served as directed)(meb)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Cedric Partee. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter and Mailing Envelope)(meb) |
| Filing fee received: $5, receipt number SYR055925 (meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
