Woods v. Tynon
| Joseph Woods |
| Teresa Tynon |
| 9:2020cv00009 |
| January 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Lawrence E Kahn |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in the above entitled case, the action is DISMISSED in favor of the Respondent and against the Petitioner; in accordance with the DECISION and ORDER of the Honorable Lawrence E. Kahn, U. S. District Judge, dated February 06, 2020. (Copy served via regular mail) (meb) |
Filing 6
DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that Petitioner's IFP Application (Dkt. No. #3 ) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the January 2, 2020 Petition (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice as duplicative of Petitioner's pending petition in Woods I; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon Petitioner in accordance with the Court's Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 2/6/2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 1/15/2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT in support of the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph Woods. (Mailing envelope included) (meb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joseph Woods. (Mailing envelope included) (meb) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 1/6/20. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph Woods.(nas ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woods v. Tynon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joseph Woods | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Teresa Tynon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
