Fox v. Gifford et al
Javell Fox |
C.O. Gifford and Sgt. Calandra |
9:2020cv00320 |
March 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Brenda K Sannes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's IFP Application (Dkt. No. #4 ) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff must, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, either (1) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full, or (2) submit an affidavit and IFP Application with certified account statements; and it is further ORDERED that in the event Plaintiff fails to timely comply with the requirements set forth in this Decision and Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice without further Order of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that upon Plaintiff's compliance with this Decision and Order, the file shall be returned to the Court for further review; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Decision and Order on Plaintiff. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a second copy of this Decision and Order, which Plaintiff may provide to the inmate accounts office at his facility along with his request for certified copies of his inmate account statements. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 4/17/2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/30/2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb) |
Filing 5 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Javell Fox. (meb) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Javell Fox. (Mailing envelope included)(meb) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's #2 IFP application is DENIED as incomplete; and it is further ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action; and it is further ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, (1) either (a) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full, or (b) submit a completed and signed IFP application; AND (2) submit a completed and signed inmate authorization form; and it is further ORDERED that, upon plaintiff's compliance with this Order, the Clerk shall reopen the action and forward it to the Court for review; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff along with a blank IFP application and a blank inmate authorization form. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/23/2020. (Copy served via regular mail, along with blank forms)(meb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Javell Fox.(nas, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calandra, C.O. Gifford filed by Javell Fox. (Attachments: #1 cover letter)(nas, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/23/2020: #2 envelope) (nas, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.